I gave Cursor 3.0, Antigravity 2.0, and Claude Code the same website project, and only one cared about the details - XDA Developers

The article conducts a comparative analysis of Cursor 3.0, Antigravity 2.0, and Claude Code, pitting them against a detailed website development project for a premium coffee brand. The goal was to see which AI tool could go beyond merely fulfilling requirements and instead focus on the subtle UI/UX details that elevate a website from functional to polished. The project included various elements such as product cards, tasting notes, subscription flows, and responsive design, providing ample opportunity to test each tool's design acumen. While Cursor 3.0 produced a functional first draft, it lacked consistency in design and failed to 'wow' the author with its output. Antigravity showed improvements in certain areas, but it was Claude Code that emerged as the clear winner. Claude Code's design for the hero section stood out, incorporating coffee-inspired colors, strong imagery, and tasteful animations that brought the page to life. It also intelligently handled elements like displaying roast levels with visual bars rather than text, and integrated trust-building details without clutter. The testimonial and newsletter sections created by Claude Code were also noted for their superior design and integration. The author concluded that Claude Code was the only tool that truly 'cared about the details,' delivering a refined and thoughtful web presence.